Greg Casar District 35 Texas Congress

Greg Casar is a progressive democrat serving as a member of congress in Texas. His currently holds the District 35 seat, coincidentally its district line run down the Interstate 35 corridor from Austin to San Antonio. It is clear aspects of his agenda have negative impacts on Texas
  • Defund the Police: Once a strong proponent of defunding the Austin police in 2020, Greg Casar faced accusations of hypocrisy when he requested police patrols in his neighborhood from the same department. This move drew notable criticism from the Austin Police Retired Officers Association, which labeled it as the “height of hypocrisy.”
  • Criminal Justice Reforms: Casar supports criminal justice reforms aimed at reducing incarceration in the justice system. However, critics argue that these reforms could lead to an increase in crime and a decrease in public safety due to being too lenient on offenders.
  • Energy: Casar has supported regulation in the energy sector. Texans have see that these policies affect people reducing style of living and prosperity. Overly strict environmental policies lead to job losses and economic downturns in these sectors. Raising all Texans cost of energy and fuel.
  • Housing Policies: Casar is an advocate for low income housing projects, such policies could reduce property values effecting home owners and or deter investment in traditional housing, ultimately harming Texans seeking to build stabilize property values to maintain prosperity in homeownership.
  • Liberal Immigration Policies: As a supporter of immigrants, sanctuary city policies and illegal entry proponent, Casar’s stance is a problem with Texans who believe that the enforcement of immigration laws need to be practiced. These policies encourage illegal immigration and undermine public safety leading to increased crime rates and strain on public resources, currently happening all over Texas.
  • Taxation: Liberal taxation and welfare policies create higher taxes and expansive social welfare programs discourage business investment and economic growth in Texas. They might also argue that these policies create dependency rather than self-sufficiency among citizens.
  • Labor Policies: Casar has supported initiatives, which businesses experience as burdensome regulations that increase operating costs and hinder economic growth. These policies make Texas less attractive to businesses and job creators. Creating a negative economic impact cities and surrounding suburbs.
  • Criminal Justice Reforms: Casar supports criminal justice reforms aimed at reducing incarceration in the justice system. However, these reforms will lead to an increase in crime. This leads to a decrease in public safety, resulting from being too lenient on offenders.
  • 2nd Amendment: Liberals wants restrictions on firearms, this infringes upon Texans’ Second Amendment rights and their ability to defend themselves. With the defunding of the police as advocated by left, more reason to support one’s personal safety.
  • Education Policies: Logical Texans see the liberal education policies as harmful, and toxic is some cases. The curriculum changes can be obscure, standardized systems need to be established. Allowing decentralized education with school choice options is not what the progressive policy makers want.
  • Healthcare Policies: Socialized healthcare policies, such as the expansion of government involvement in healthcare provision, leads to increased taxes and government overreach in the healthcare sector. Thus leading more people to become government dependence.
Many people think Casar’s beliefs and policies, and other like him could lead to the potential downfall of the United States. Liberal policies that stem from deeply held ideological differences and varying interpretations of what constitutes a successful governance strategy. Here are some liberal policies that Casar supports:
  • Economic Policies: Liberal economic policies, such as high taxes, extensive government regulation, and expansive welfare programs, stifle economic growth, discourage entrepreneurship, and lead to unsustainable levels of government debt. These policies weaken the economy over time, leading to economic decline and reduced global competitiveness.


  • Supporting Socialist Ideals: Liberal social welfare programs create dependency on government assistance and discourage self-reliance and individual initiative. These programs contribute to a culture of entitlement and weaken the work ethic of the population, ultimately leading to societal decay and a loss of national resilience. Socialists governments operating under tyranny eventually become a regimes, dictatorships or communist.


  • Allowing Illegal Immigration: The liberal immigration policies support undocumented immigrants and lax border enforcement, could lead to negative social and economic consequences. Currently, uncontrolled immigration puts strain on public resources, costs money,  increases crime rates, and undermine national security, ultimately eroding social cohesion and destabilizing the country.


  • Contributing Cultural Destruction: He promote values and behaviors that are detrimental to societal stability and moral fabric. Advocated extreme gender confusion affecting the breakdown of traditional family structures, and the promotion of identity politics as evidence of a broader cultural decline that are weakening the social fabric of the nation and mental stability of the youth.


  • Support Aggressive Foreign Policy: Current Democrat foreign policy could undermine America’s global standing and security by supporting other country’s wars. War leads to killing of innocent people, geopolitical instability, conflict and disruption here at home, and loss of the people’s hard earned paid tax dollars and sometime American lives.
In Summary:
The problem with defunding the police is exemplified the actions of progressive Congressman Greg Casar, who, despite advocating for reduced police funding, faced accusations of hypocrisy after requesting enhanced police patrols at his own home. This contradiction highlights the hypocracy surrounding Casar’s administrative conflicts. His Illegal immigration and border security pose significant risks, as evidenced by criticisms directed at Casar’s support for sanctuary city policies and more lenient immigration laws. Its now proven that such policies strain public resources, increase crime rates, and undermine national security, ultimately eroding social cohesion and destabilizing communities. The construction of low-income and indigent housing, advocated by Casar as part of his affordable housing initiatives, is viewed negatively by some individuals who argue that it could reduce property values and deter investment in traditional housing, ultimately harming Texans seeking to build stable property values and prosperity through homeownership. He supports undesirable education programs, including curriculum changes that have faced criticism for their extreme content causing negative effects to the quality of education and school choice options in Texas. Some Texans believe that these policies have had detrimental impacts on educational outcomes and opportunities for students, not agreeing with Casar. He has advocated for criminal justice reform, such as those supported by Casar aimed at reducing incarceration, face opposition, law enforcement know that these policies compromise public safety by being too lenient on offenders. Supporting welfare programs, a cornerstone of liberal policies, discourages business investment and economic growth in Texas, or any state or community.. Critics argue that such policies create dependency rather than self-sufficiency among citizens and contribute to the decay of society over time. These arguments reflect broader ideological differences and concerns about the long-term implications of implementing liberal policies.
Article by Article Summary:
Progressive congressman Rep. Gregorio “Greg” Casar of Texas faces accusations of hypocrisy after requesting enhanced police patrols at his home, despite his vocal support for defunding the Austin Police Department (APD) in the past. Casar’s call for police assistance comes just days after he criticized the APD and his previous advocacy for defunding the department while serving on the city council. This move has drawn sharp criticism, with the Austin Police Retired Officers Association (APROA) labeling it as the “height of hypocrisy” and suggesting that Casar should consider hiring private security like some of his congressional counterparts instead. The revelation of Casar’s request for police patrols follows his recent letter to the Justice Department, where he highlighted the need for systemic reforms within the APD regarding excessive use of force, racial discrimination, and treatment of individuals with mental health conditions. This apparent contradiction between his public stance on policing issues and his private actions has sparked backlash, with APROA’s president denouncing Casar’s behavior as emblematic of the broader trend among certain politicians who criticize law enforcement while simultaneously seeking their assistance when needed. While Casar’s office refrains from commenting on specific security matters, the Austin Police Department confirms its awareness of the request and asserts its commitment to treating all public safety concerns seriously. However, the situation underscores broader tensions surrounding policing and political discourse, particularly in the aftermath of nationwide protests following incidents of police brutality. Casar’s actions exemplify the complexities and contradictions inherent in navigating issues of law enforcement and public safety within the realm of politics.
Progressive Rep. Greg Casar of Texas, a recent addition to the group known as “The Squad,” faced widespread mockery on Twitter for his “thirst strike” protest lasting less than 10 hours. Casar’s demonstration, aimed at advocating for federally mandated water breaks, drew criticism from many who dismissed it as a trivial feat, with some likening his 9-hour abstention from food and water to merely skipping breakfast or lunch at work. Critics pointed out the staged nature of the event, suggesting it was more of a publicity stunt than a genuine act of protest. Twitter users lampooned Casar’s protest, with many humorously noting that they routinely go through similar periods without drinking as part of their daily routines, such as during sleep. The congressman’s dramatic photo, featuring him appearing fatigued with what seems to be a heart rate monitor on his finger, became a focal point for ridicule, further fueling the derision. The widespread mockery underscored the perception of Casar’s protest as lacking in substance and authenticity, prompting reflections on the efficacy of such performative acts in advancing political causes.
Progressive congressman Greg Casar, affiliated with “The Squad,” faces criticism for requesting police patrols at his Austin home despite his previous advocacy for defunding the same police department while serving on the city council and recent criticism of the department’s alleged racist practices. The Austin Police Retired Officers Association labeled Casar’s request hypocritical, suggesting he should opt for private security like his congressional counterparts. Casar’s request, forwarded through the United States Capitol Police, sparked debate amid ongoing police shortage and officer retirements, consequences of the 2020 defunding Casar championed. His recent letter to the Justice Department highlighting issues within the Austin Police Department intensifies scrutiny, reigniting discussions about the efficacy of defunding the police and reallocating resources for community safety and well-being, prompting reflections on the complex dynamics of policing and political activism.
Texas Democrat Rep. Greg Casar, previously a staunch advocate for defunding the Austin police in 2020, faced accusations of hypocrisy after requesting police patrols in his neighborhood from the same department. Casar’s request, facilitated through the United States Capitol Police and followed by a recent letter to the Justice Department criticizing the Austin police for racism and discrimination, drew sharp criticism, notably from the Austin Police Retired Officers Association, labeling it the “height of hypocrisy.” Despite Casar’s past efforts to drastically reduce police funding while serving on the City Council, resulting in resignations and retirements from the department, his recent call for police assistance has reignited debates over policing and political activism. While some argue for the necessity of security resources regardless of political stance, others see Casar’s actions as emblematic of the contradictions within the defund the police movement.
Progressive Rep. Greg Casar of Texas, a recent addition to “The Squad,” faced widespread ridicule on Twitter for his hours-long “thirst strike” protest, which lasted less than 10 hours. Despite Casar’s attempt to portray the demonstration as a significant act of advocacy, many commentators saw it as nothing more than a senseless media stunt, questioning the premise of his protest and mocking the exaggerated attention it received. Critics derided Casar’s actions as demeaning to his own intelligence and that of his constituents, suggesting that enduring a few hours without food or water is a routine occurrence for most people and hardly qualifies as a hunger strike. The congressman’s attempt to use the protest to highlight a nonexistent law banning water breaks for workers further fueled the mockery, with observers dismissing the entire affair as absurd and devoid of any meaningful substance.
When assessing policies and their impacts, it’s crucial to recognize their far-reaching effects, both in Texas and nationwide. Socialist policies, whether in Texas or on a larger scale, have frequently resulted in adverse outcomes for citizens, affecting them in various ways. The potential repercussions of liberal policies are diverse, but economic evidence consistently indicates a historical trend towards collective breakdown, failure, or implosion. Horizontal collectivism, prioritizing collective well-being over individual interests, can often lead to negative consequences. Liberal policies, which often champion such collectivism, have been linked to dire outcomes, including personal financial decline, austerity measures, and societal dysfunction. Frequently, decisions made by congressional leaders, whether due to conflicting interests or lack of foresight, exacerbate these impacts on people within the community, state, or country.
The data in this document was complied and edited with the use of artificial intelligence. After compiling the this outline of factual information and the AI was asked “is Greg Casar failing or helping the United States.”
Answer:  “Greg Casar’s policies and actions, including his support for defunding the police, criminal justice reforms, and other liberal initiatives, have sparked controversy and drawn criticism, it could have negative impact on Texas citizens and the United States as a whole.”